I remember back in the 1970s when a friend asked me if I'd heard the new Fleetwood Mac album. (Yes, I'll wait while you snicker.) I said I had and that I'd gladly make him a tape of it. Little did I know I had, in so doing, become a pirate, depriving Stevie Nicks and friends of one sale's worth of royalties. In fact, I had a Panasonic stereo that allowed me to tape directly from records, so I made quite a few tapes for my friends, for FREE, thus earning myself a peg leg, eyepatch, and stuffed parrot.
Fast forward a few years, and you have bands like Metallica, who owe their entire fame to fans who made and zealously distributed illegal home-made recordings of the band's live performances. Ironically, of course, Metallica turned out just a few years later (after getting rich) to be among the most vocal opponents of bootlegging.
Then, of course, there's Napster... and with it the realization that people were sharing music (gasp!) for FREE, and on a global scale, not just at headbanger parking lot keggers. But we all know what happened to Napster.
Now, with the advance of technology, we have users sharing, swapping, Wiki-ing, and blipping copyrighted content all over the place. And in response we have SOPA (the Stop Online Piracy Act) as the latest attempt, through über-strict control of all online media, to stop royalty-free sharing of, basically, anything. The only problem is: such control would cripple the Internet. (For a concise review of SOPA issues and FAQs, check out this link.)
The closest analogy that comes to mind is the attitude sheep ranchers have taken toward wolves. Rather than accept that a few head of sheep will be lost to wolves annually, ranchers propose the irradication of the wolf (by gun, by trap, by bomb if necessary), regardless of any other effects that irradication might have on the delicate balance of the ecosystem. Seems (to me) that a far more rational response would be acceptance. You're going to lose a few sheep (and yes, a few dollars) and I'm sorry. But extinction of a valuable predator species, and the shockwaves that event would produce, are no answer.
Same with online media sharing, piracy, whatever. I know that royalty-free sharing hurts smaller artists, and I am truly sorry. I know musicians who are struggling to make a buck. But crippling the Internet is not the answer. Lawmakers, go back to the drawing board and come up with something else. Now I understand that SOPA's creator is from Texas, and that Texans have a history of, shall we say, overreaction. I believe the state motto is: If you can't sell it, fuck it, or turn it into oil, then kill it. (It's on the state flag. In small print.) But this may be one time that restraint is a better answer.
Either devise a more targeted approach to online piracy or accept that it is part of a global society that freely enchanges information. So email your Rep in Congress, email your Senator, and tell them SOPA is not the answer.